a5589306ex99

Slide: 1 Title: January 2008 CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. (Gp:) *Corpus Christi LNG, LLC Cheniere Energy, Inc. 100% *Artist’s Rendition (Gp:) *Creole Trail LNG, L.P. Cheniere Energy, Inc. 100% *Freeport LNG Development, L.P. Cheniere Energy, Inc. 30% * Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. Cheniere Energy, Inc. 91%

Slide: 2 Body: This presentation contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included herein are “forward-looking statements.” Included among “forward-looking statements” are, among other things:

statements that we expect to commence or complete construction of each or any of our proposed liquefied natural gas, or LNG, receiving

terminals by certain dates, or at all; statements that we expect to receive authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, to construct and operate proposed LNG receiving terminals by a certain date, or at all; statements regarding future levels of domestic natural gas production and consumption, or the future level of LNG imports into North America, or regarding projected future capacity of liquefaction or regasification, liquifaction utilization or total monthly LNG trade facilities worldwide, regardless of the source of such information statements regarding any financing transactions or arrangements, whether on the part of Cheniere or at the project level; statements relating to the construction of our proposed LNG receiving terminals, including statements concerning estimated costs, and the engagement of any EPC contractor; statements regarding any Terminal Use Agreement, or TUA, or other commercial arrangements presently contracted, optioned, marketed or potential arrangements to be performed substantially in the future, including any cash distributions and revenues anticipated to be received; statements regarding the commercial terms and potential revenues from activities described in this presentation; statements regarding the commercial terms or potential revenue from any arrangements which may arise from the marketing of uncommitted capacity from any of the terminals, including the Creole Trail and Corpus Christi terminals which do not currently have contractual commitments; statements regarding the commercial terms or potential revenue from any arrangement relating to the proposed contracting for excess or expansion capacity for the Sabine Pass LNG Terminal or the Indexed Purchase Agreement (“IPA”) or LNG spot purchase examples described in this presentation; statements that our proposed LNG receiving terminals, when completed, will have certain characteristics, including amounts of regasification and storage capacities, a number of storage tanks and docks and pipeline interconnections; statements regarding Cheniere and Cheniere Marketing forecasts, and any potential revenues and capital expenditures which may be derived from any of Cheniere business groups; statements regarding Cheniere Pipeline Company, and the capital expenditures and potential revenues related to this business group; statements regarding our proposed LNG receiving terminals’ access to existing pipelines, and their ability to obtain transportation capacity on existing pipelines; statements regarding the Cheniere Southern Trail Pipeline, and its potential business opportunities statements regarding possible expansions of the currently projected size of any of our proposed LNG receiving terminals; statements regarding the payment by Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. of cash distributions; statements regarding our business strategy, our business plan or any other plans, forecasts, examples, models, or objectives; any or all of which are subject to change; statements regarding estimated corporate overhead expenses; and any other statements that relate to non-historical information.These forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of terms and phrases such as “achieve,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “example,” “expect,” “forecast,” “opportunities,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “propose,” “subject to,” and similar terms and phrases. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, they do involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties, and these expectations may prove to be incorrect. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this presentation. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in “Risk Factors” in the Cheniere Energy, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which are incorporated by reference into this presentation. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these ”Risk Factors”. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this presentation, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. Safe Harbor Act

Slide: 3 Cheniere Marketing Asset Development Partnership Interests Sabine Pass LNG 4.0 Bcf/d LNG Terminal Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (AMEX:CQP) 90.6% Interest (GP & LP units) Creole Trail LNG Terminal Creole Trail Pipeline Corpus Christi LNG Terminal Freeport LNG Development, L.P.(Freeport LNG Terminal) 30% LP Interest Cheniere Southern Trail Pipeline (Proposed Pipeline)

Slide: 4 Title: Freeport LNG Development, L.P. Cheniere Energy, Inc. 30% Freeport LNG Construction Site August 2007 Body: Send-out capacity of 1.5 Bcf/d TUA Contracts totaling 1.55 Bcf/d Conoco 0.90 Bcf/d Dow 0.50 Bcf/d Mitsubishi 0.15 Bcf/d Facility ownership: Cheniere (30%), M. Smith (45%), Contango (10%) and Dow (15%) Contango recently announced an agreement to sell their 10% interest to an undisclosed Asian utility for $68 million Freeport LNG has obtained ~$1.1 billion debt to fund construction Cheniere expects to receive annual cash receipts of ~$15mm* * Cash distributions expected beginning in Q308

Slide: 5 Title: Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (AMEX: CQP) Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. Cheniere Energy, Inc. 90.6% Sabine Pass Construction Site – January 2008 Body: 4 Bcf/d capacity contracted at Sabine Pass facility resulting in annual revenues of approximately: ~$256 MM from CVX and Total ~$256 MM from Marketing Operating costs, debt service costs and common unit holder distributions are estimated to be $245 MM to $255 MM* Annual distribution is $1.70 per unit and will be paid to all unit holders beginning mid 2009** * Estimate for 2010 full year basis ** Currently CQP is paying $1.70 per share to common unit holders. Distributions to GP and subordinated units expected to start in 2009.

Slide: 6 Sabine PL Targa Transco Gulf South Trunkline Jefferson Island Storage Sabine Pass LNG Terminal Phase I – 2Q 2008 Phase II – 2Q 2009 Creole Trail LNG Terminal Henry Hub Varibus NGPL Transco Bridgeline Tennessee Florida Gas Creole Trail Pipeline* Liberty Storage Starks Storage Hackberry Storage Texas Eastern Gulf Coast Markets Northeast Markets Southeast Markets Midwest / Great Lakes Markets Connects with Henry Hub Gulf of Mexico 4Q 2007 ANR Texas Gas Transco Florida Gas Columbia Gulf Cypress Egan Storage Pine Prairie Energy Center Tennessee 2Q 2008 M.P. 58 Creole Trail – MP 58* Creole Trail – Phase II 6 Potential Pipeline Interconnects: Estimated Cost: $500-550 MM Expected in-service: 2Q 2008 2 Bcf/d capacity, 1200 btu

Slide: 7 Title: Next Generation of Terminals Including Some Terminals Under Construction Body: Higher construction costs: ~ $1 billion for 1 Bcf/d Utilization constraints: Operational: Marine access Pipeline takeaway Storage Market size and access Affects regional price basis Seasonality Regas hurdle rate: $0.75 - $1.00 per MMBtu $0.32 per MMBtu TUA is a thing of the past

Slide: 8 Title: Cheniere Energy Partners Growth Projects Body: Fuel Efficiency Projects at Sabine Pass LNG Maximizes plant fuel efficiency using waste heat recovery and ambient air technology Customers charged 2% fuel retainage fee Projects expected to reduce fuel usage by 50% to 75% Actual savings depends on gas prices and plant throughput Developed over next few years, expected in-service 2010 – 2011 Expected funding from excess cash and financing Cheniere Southern Trail Pipeline Proposed pipeline extending from Louisiana to Florida

Slide: 9 Dq SESH - Lucedale SONAT Gulf South FGT 11 Tennessee Dequincy TGC, TETCO, Transco 45, Sempra, Liberty Storage Cheniere Sabine Pass LNG Johnson Bayou NGPL, Bridgeline, SWLateral TETCO FGT Tennessee (Gp:) Scale - Approximate (Gp:) 0 (Gp:) 40 (Gp:) 60 miles (Gp:) 20 FGT 9 LIG Cheniere Southern Trail Pipeline Gulfstream Eunice ANR, TxGas, Egan Storage, Pine Prairie Storage Transco 65 Southern Trail - Proposed Creole Trail – Under Construction Creole Trail – FERC Authorized Je Fl FGT 12 9

Slide: 10 Value Drivers Future Growth in MLP Assets Corpus Christi LNG terminal Creole Trail LNG terminal Future Acquisitions Cheniere Marketing Validates value of subordinated units Intrinsic value of Marketing operations

Slide: 11 Everett Cove Point Elba Island Lake Charles Sabine Pass Freeport Golden Pass Cameron Costa Azúl Canaport Existing Under Construction Altamira Source: Websites of Terminal Owners, Wood Mackenzie Limited, Poten & Partners Title: North America Onshore Regasification Capacity By 2010 15.8 Bcf/d North American Atlantic Basin capacity @ 65% utilization = 10.3 Bcf/d

Slide: 12 LNG Fundamentals Value of Marketing

Slide: 13 Title: New Liquefaction Competes for Market Share Source: CERA, 2006 Atlantic Basin 12 Bcf/d ME Gulf 11 Bcf/d Asia Pacific 13 Bcf/d 2005 Europe 4.7 Bcf/d 2005 12.3 Bcf/d 2005 NA 1.8 Bcf/d (Gp:) 2010 Liquefaction Capacity (Gp:) 2005 Consumption 5 15 25 35 45 36 23 24 26 30 35 Bcf/d Liquefaction Capacity Firm Existing Liquefaction Under Construction Proposed Liquefaction Projected 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Slide: 14 Title: 2010 Annual Balance - Bcf/d Global Liquefaction Capacity 36 Estimated LNG Delivery @ 90% 32 Asian Consumption <~16> European Consumption <~ 6> Remaining for North America ~10 Source: Cheniere Research

Slide: 15 Title: Constraint is not Regasification but Natural Gas Consumption Source: GIIGNL; Waterborne LNG; Cheniere Research Regasification is built for peak utilization because of seasonal variations Bcf/d Asia Europe North America

Slide: 16 Title: Demand Seasonality will Impact Flows Source: IEA 2006 Demand 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Belgium Spain France UK US GC Bcf/d

Slide: 17 Title: . . . and Pipeline Competition in Europe . . . Transatlantic LNG Deep and liquid market with large storage and summer peak demand will balance global LNG supply Pipeline gas supply into Europe will compete to push LNG to higher value markets. (Gp:) New Pipeline (Gp:) Existing Pipeline (Gp:) Expansion

Slide: 18 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.3 2.3 4.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 9.2 11.7 7.9 6.6 - 2 4 6 8 10 12 2007 2008 2009 2010 Bcf/d Nigeria Yemen Qatar Oman Abu Dhabi Trinidad Norway Eq. Guinea Egypt Algeria Title: . . . Means More LNG is Becoming Flexible Flexible LNG to the Atlantic Basin by Producing Country 12 Bcf/d of LNG with access to Atlantic Basin has destination flexibility Additional volumes could become flexible should the contract parties agree Source: Cheniere Energy Research

Slide: 19 Title: NYMEX vs. NBP – January 17, 2008 Historical Data Futures as of 1/17/08

Slide: 20 Title: NYMEX vs. NBP – August 6, 2007 Historical Data Futures as of 08/06/07

Slide: 21 Title: NYMEX vs. NBP – January 16, 2007 Historical Data Futures as of 1/16/07

Slide: 22 Title: NYMEX vs NBP - September 21, 2006 Historical Data Futures as of 9/21/06

Slide: 23 Title: European Storage: 2007 vs 5yr Avg * Figures represent PIRA’s projections 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Bcm 5 yr Avg 2007 Total

Slide: 24 Title: European Storage by Country * Figures represent PIRA’s projections 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Bcm End of 2007 vs 5 yr Avg End of Dec 15.6 9.2 6 1.5 3.8 3.9 39.98 5 yr Avg 15.8 7.4 5.7 1 1.8 3.8 35.43 Germany France Italy Spain Austria U.K. Total

Slide: 25 307 73% 143 72% 196 64% 101 67% 204 66% 241 65% Draw in the 2nd week of Jan mostly in Baumgarten (14%) and Iberian market area (6%) Title: European Gas Storage Inventory - Bcf *Inventory as of Jan 14, 2008 Source: GSE 1/14/08

Slide: 26 Title: Worldwide Liquefaction Capacity Source: GIIGNL; Poten, Cheniere Research 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 2004 2005 2006 NLNG T6 Snohvit RG T5 Eq. Guinea Bcf/d

Slide: 27 Title: Liquefaction - Growth (Gp:) Worldwide Liquefaction (Gp:) - (Gp:) 5 (Gp:) 10 (Gp:) 15 (Gp:) 20 (Gp:) 25 (Gp:) 30 (Gp:) 35 (Gp:) 40 (Gp:) 45 (Gp:) Q1 (Gp:) Q2 (Gp:) Q3 (Gp:) Q4 (Gp:) Q1 (Gp:) Q2 (Gp:) Q3 (Gp:) Q4 (Gp:) Q1 (Gp:) Q2 (Gp:) Q3 (Gp:) Q4 (Gp:) Q1 (Gp:) Q2 (Gp:) Q3 (Gp:) Q4 (Gp:) Q1 (Gp:) Q2 (Gp:) Q3 (Gp:) Q4 (Gp:) Q1 (Gp:) Q2 (Gp:) Q3 (Gp:) Q4 (Gp:) Q1 (Gp:) Q2 (Gp:) Q3 (Gp:) Q4 (Gp:) 2004 (Gp:) 2005 (Gp:) 2006 (Gp:) 2007 (Gp:) 2008 (Gp:) 2009 (Gp:) 2010 (Gp:) Bcf/d Source: Cheniere Research

Slide: 28 Title: Worldwide Liquefaction Utilization Source: Poten, Cheniere Research (Gp:) 0% (Gp:) 10% (Gp:) 20% (Gp:) 30% (Gp:) 40% (Gp:) 50% (Gp:) 60% (Gp:) 70% (Gp:) 80% (Gp:) 90% (Gp:) 100% (Gp:) 110% (Gp:) 120% (Gp:) Jan (Gp:) Feb (Gp:) Mar (Gp:) Apr (Gp:) May (Gp:) Jun (Gp:) Jul (Gp:) Aug (Gp:) Sep (Gp:) Oct (Gp:) Nov (Gp:) Dec (Gp:) 2007 (Gp:) 2004 (Gp:) 2005 (Gp:) 2006

Slide: 29 Title: Europe – Total LNG Imports Source: Poten, Cheniere Research (Gp:) 0 (Gp:) 1 (Gp:) 2 (Gp:) 3 (Gp:) 4 (Gp:) 5 (Gp:) 6 (Gp:) 7 (Gp:) 8 (Gp:) 9 (Gp:) 10 (Gp:) Jan (Gp:) Feb (Gp:) Mar (Gp:) Apr (Gp:) May (Gp:) Jun (Gp:) Jul (Gp:) Aug (Gp:) Sep (Gp:) Oct (Gp:) Nov (Gp:) Dec (Gp:) 2007 (Gp:) 2006 Total (Gp:) 2005 Total

Slide: 30 Title: Asia – Total LNG Imports Source: Poten, Cheniere Research (Gp:) 0 (Gp:) 2 (Gp:) 4 (Gp:) 6 (Gp:) 8 (Gp:) 10 (Gp:) 12 (Gp:) 14 (Gp:) 16 (Gp:) 18 (Gp:) 20 (Gp:) Jan (Gp:) Feb (Gp:) Mar (Gp:) Apr (Gp:) May (Gp:) Jun (Gp:) Jul (Gp:) Aug (Gp:) Sep (Gp:) Oct (Gp:) Nov (Gp:) Dec (Gp:) 2007 (Gp:) 2006 (Gp:) 2005

Slide: 31 Title: North America – Total LNG Imports Source: Poten, Cheniere Research (Gp:) 0 (Gp:) 1 (Gp:) 2 (Gp:) 3 (Gp:) 4 (Gp:) 5 (Gp:) Jan (Gp:) Feb (Gp:) Mar (Gp:) Apr (Gp:) May (Gp:) Jun (Gp:) Jul (Gp:) Aug (Gp:) Sep (Gp:) Oct (Gp:) Nov (Gp:) Dec (Gp:) Bcf/d (Gp:) 2007 (Gp:) 2006 (Gp:) 2005

Slide: 32 1 Bcf/d by 2010 12 Bcf/d of undecided gas globally 86% of Henry Hub

94% - 65 cents (GdF transaction) Seek to capture portion of redirect rights Estimate 30 cargoes annually

Title: Cheniere Marketing Strategy Term Contracts: Indexed Purchase Agreements (IPA) Spot Market: 1 Bcf/d portion Seek to capture arbitrage value of HH vs NBP FOB cargoes LNG Gateway: ~ 60 to 100 cargoes annually Note: The above outlines the current strategy of Cheniere Marketing, which is subject to change. Please refer to Page 2 of this presentation.

Slide: 33 Title: Cheniere Growth Strategy Body: Pursue acquisitions for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (AMEX: CQP) Continue asset development: terminals and pipelines Develop a balanced supply portfolio for Cheniere Marketing between long-term IPA’s and LNG Gateway exposure to the spot, option and short-term markets to optimize seasonality

Slide: 35 Title: Condensed Balance Sheet Cheniere Energy Other Cheniere Consolidated Partners, L.P. Energy, Inc. (1) Cheniere Energy, Inc. Unrestricted cash (2) - $ - 447 $ 447 $ Restricted cash and securities 885 45 930 Property, plant and equipment 1,006 393 1,399 Goodwill and other assets 71 170 241 Total assets 1,962 $ 1,055 $ 3,017 $ Deferred revenue and other liabilities 133 $ 100 $ 233 $ Long-term debt 2,032 725 2,757 Minority interest - 293 293 Equity (203) (63) (266) 1,962 $ 1,055 $ 3,017 $ Includes intercompany eliminations. Includes restricted cash held at CQP for construction of the Sabine Pass regas facility and debt service on notes. The Creole Trail pipeline is being developed at Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) with an estimated cost of $500-550 million. September 30, 2007 (unaudited, in millions)